docs: new file Documentation/howto-contribute.txt

The file contens are mostly from former README.devel.

Signed-off-by: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@iki.fi>
This commit is contained in:
Sami Kerola 2011-08-12 20:47:42 +02:00
parent 22a3b8c9bd
commit 90a1baf6cb
3 changed files with 93 additions and 93 deletions

View File

@ -2,94 +2,6 @@
Notes for util-linux developers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
AUTOTOOLS:
* "./autogen.sh" generates all files needed to compile and install the code
(run it after checkout from git)
* "make distclean" removes all unnecessary files, but the code can still be
recompiled with "./configure; make"
* "make dist-gzip" (or -bzip2) creates a tarball that can be configured and
compiled without running "./autogen.sh"
PATCHES:
* send your patches to the mailing list or to the upstream maintainer
(see the AUTHORS and README files)
* diff -u
* don't include generated (autotools) stuff to your patches
(hint: use git-clean [-X])
* patches are delivered via email only. Downloading them from internet
servers is a pain.
* one patch per email, with the changelog in the body of the email.
* many small patches are favoured over one big. Break down is done on
basis of logical functionality; for example #endif mark ups, compiler
warning and exit codes fixes all should be individual small patches.
* Subject: [PATCH] subsystem: description
* if someone else wrote the patch, they should be credited (and blamed)
for it. To communicate this, add a line:
From: John Doe <jdoe@wherever.com>
* add a Signed-off-by line (hint: use "git commit -s")
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the
patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to
pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you
can certify the below:
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
then you just add a line saying
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
* for more details see:
The perfect patch
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt
CODING STYLE:
* the preferred coding style is based on the linux kernel Documentation/CodingStyle.
For more details see:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob_plain;f=Documentation/CodingStyle
SCM (source code management):
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git util-linux

View File

@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
Patches
* send your patches to the mailing list or to the upstream maintainer
(see the AUTHORS and README files)
* diff -u
* don't include generated (autotools) stuff to your patches (hint:
use git clean -Xd)
* neutrality; The stuff in util-linux should be rather
distribution-neutral. No RPMs/DEBs/... are provided - get yours
from your distributor.
* patches are delivered via email only. Downloading them from
internet servers is a pain.
* one patch per email, with the changelog in the body of the email.
* many small patches are favoured over one big. Break down is done on
basis of logical functionality; for example #endif mark ups,
compiler warning and exit codes fixes all should be individual
small patches.
* Subject: [PATCH] subsystem: description
* if someone else wrote the patch, they should be credited (and
blamed) for it. To communicate this, add a line:
From: John Doe <jdoe@wherever.com>
* add a Signed-off-by line (hint: use "git commit -s")
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the
patch, which certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the
right to pass it on as a open-source patch. The rules are pretty
simple: if you can certify the below:
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including
all personal information I submit with it, including my
sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed
consistent with this project or the open source license(s)
involved.
then you just add a line saying
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous
contributions.)
* for more details see: The perfect patch
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt
Before sending a patch
* make sure that after patching source files will compile without
errors.
* test that previously existed program behaviour is not
unintentionally alterred. If you alter the behaviour tell about in
commit message.
Coding style
* the preferred coding style is based on the linux kernel
Documentation/CodingStyle. For more details see:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob_plain;f=Documentation/CodingStyle
* Use `FIXME:' and a good description if want to inform others
something is not quite right, and you are unwilling to fix the
issue.

6
README
View File

@ -28,16 +28,12 @@ SOURCE CODE:
Checkout:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git util-linux
NLS (PO TRANSLATIONS):
PO files are maintained by:
http://translationproject.org/domain/util-linux-ng.html
NEUTRALITY:
The stuff in util-linux should be rather distribution-neutral.
No RPMs/DEBs/... are provided - get yours from your distributor.
VERSION SCHEMA: